AGBT 2010 - Thomas Briese - Columbia University
New Frontiers in Molecular Diagnosis of Infectious Diseases
The Zoonotic Pool (Morse 1993)
* Assuming that 20 viruses exist for each vertebrate, more than 99% of viruses remain to be found.
Recent Emerging /re-emerging diseases - threats to global health.
[Pictures of diseases, where they come from.... comic about king Tut being diagnosed with West Nile virus...]
* More serious discussion of history of West Nile Virus.
* Identified separately as both human encephalitis, and death in birds... eventually converged
Hong Kong & Sars...
* unfortunately add: "Visiting hong kong will take your breath away."
Why do we need new methods?
* 40-60% of samples will be unidentified or undiagnosed - acute respiratory infection
* 60% of encephalitis is never explained
* enteric infection is undiagnosed in 40% of cases
Introducing a staged sample for pathogen detection.
* this is faster
* more sensitive
* automate-able
* work with non-infectious nucleotides
* incoming samples screened (multiplexed PCR)
* if not known, move to array...
* if still not known, move to sequencing.
* Surveillance assays, QPCR, Serology, Koch's Postulates...
MassTag PCR.
* New technology for sensitive, highly multiplexed, rapid differential diagnose of common viral diseases.
* Has software, aligners, etc.
* primers are tagged, pcr purification on plate, elute to well, use mass spec, automated injection, identification of pathogen by signal analysis.
Has been applied - eg, New York State, 2004-2005.
* decrease in positive signals for infuenza, so a retrospective study was taken.
* 151 patients sample - found identical previously results, but also were able to diagnose 30% more samples. eg, tripple infections, etc.
* undiagnosed also included rhinoviruses (common cold)
* many rhinovirses turne out to be type C, which was unexpected. [not sure if it's because type C wasn't well known, or if it's just these types were not known.]
Not everything is resolved by multiplex PCR... Greene chips.
* named after Donor.
* highly multiplexed
Task 1: Select probes, devised selection mechanism that represents all sequence in genebank
* QUarterly results
Task 2: Amplify and label. Random amplification in sample, and lift to clinically relevant detection level.
Tested a sample on MARV, couldn't be found in standard pcr, etc...
ended up diagnosing as something else... plasmodia? [not sure how that fits with the gene chip.]
Pathogen discovery by NGS.
* used to sequence EVERYTHING in sample.
* if massTag PCR and GreeneChip fail, do HTS.
* Started with Colony Collapse Disorder
* All technologies were geared to vertebrate. but they did isolate a virus... however, not necessarily associated with causation.
Example: Transplant associated pathogenicity.
* Had a difficult time, as virus was very different from known viruses... only 14 tags observed
Forgotten Scripts and the puzzled librarian.
* How do you work with lost languages?
* Use patterns or word probabilities
* Did the same thing for viruses.
Unknown Disease of Parrots
* took tissue from brain of parrots
* discovered Bonavirus[?]
[This talk is incredibly difficult to follow - it's a lot or anecdotes on a theme. I'm sure that's reflected in my notes. Each item is interesting, but it's difficult to tie the common elements together to form a single picture. Mixing method anecdote and acknowledgements together...]
Nosocomial infection
* all died - except patient number 5.
* no disease was initially identified.
* eventually discovered new Hemorrhagic fever by sequencing.
* it has a very diverse biology, sequence, etc.
Hot spots for infectious diseases.
* Go to where the emerging diseases are likely to be..
* Look at the reservoirs
* work on preventative issues.
Projects include
* bats from bangledesh
Lastly: Unexplained encephalopathy
* hts revealed two sequences w 30% homology to mink astrovirus
* Not an efficient path.
* PCR gave more,
* Eventually identified new astrovirus.
* caused them to rethink pipeline, which is leading to new methods.
* better performance.
Prospective birth cohort samples with Norwegian govt.
* building a biobank from mothers, cord blood, fathers, etc
Quote from Einstein
Student: The questions are all the same from last year
Einstein: True, but this year the answers are all different
Question: how often are outbreaks followed up? And how many can't be solved?
Answer: depends on how many they are made aware of. The better the quality of the sample, the better the odds of getting the disease. Can even handle tissue samples.
Labels: AGBT 2010
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home